A resident called the Norfolk County district attorney's office last week inquiring about possible legal violations stemming from a March 6 meeting between residents, town officials and employees of Competitive Power Ventures.
Until a formal complaint is made, though, there is "nothing under investigation or review by (the district attorney's office) at this time in the town of Walpole," said David Traub, spokesman for the district attorney's office.
Any resident can request, in writing, that the D.A.'s office investigate whether any board has violated the state's Open Meeting Law, Traub said. Or, any three citizens can file suit in Norfolk Superior Court, he said.
With certain exceptions, state law requires that all government meetings be open to the public and that no quorum of any governmental body meet in private to decide, or move toward deciding, an issue.
Between 20 and 30 residents and Town Meeting members and a handful of Competitive Power officials attended a March 6 meeting at a Precinct 4 home. The meeting took place four days before a special Town Meeting dealt with the zoning bylaw rewrite related to the Competitive Power's interest in building a 580-megawatt power plant in South Walpole.
Many residents and Town Meeting members framed Article 2 as a referendum on the power plant. The article fell nine votes short of passing.
After an official for Competitive Power spoke about the meeting in May, many residents called for an investigation.
"This is very upsetting to myself and the citizens of Walpole," John Vaillancourt, a Precinct 5 Town Meeting hopeful, said at the time. He worried that Competitive Power could have used the March 6 meeting to improperly influence the voting on Article 2 at special Town Meeting.
Those at the get-together deny anything improper took place.
Town Moderator Jon Rockwood said he had never heard of anyone improperly influencing Town Meeting or Town Meeting members. An online discussion group of state moderators deals with "everything under the sun," he said. But that issue had never come up.
Any promises contingent on a certain action would be improper, he said. But he didn't know of any allegations of that. He understood the meeting as "merely an exchange of information."
Asked to imagine what might constitute improper influence, Rockwood wondered if guests were privy to information that other Town Meeting members weren't. He didn't know if this would be improper.